After managing numerous dedicated and VPS servers across Europe for the past decade, I found myself needing a reliable VPS Uzbekistan solution last year.

In my experience working with various cloud hosting Uzbekistan providers, I’ve tested around five different VPS providers, but when it came to finding the best VPS provider Uzbekistan has to offer, I narrowed it down to a detailed comparison between two standout options.

💪
Disclaimer: I have no affiliation with either Airnet.uz or Servercore.uz. All benchmarks, opinions, and experiences shared in this review are based on my genuine testing and usage of both VPS Tashkent providers.

Why I Chose Airnet vs Servercore for Testing

During my search for fast VPS Uzbekistan options, I discovered that these two providers offered the best value proposition in the market.

What attracted me initially was the latency advantage.

From my location in Tashkent, I measured approximately 5ms latency to both Airnet and Servercore servers, compared to 100ms for my European VPS servers.

I chose these specific VDS Uzbekistan providers because of their internet speed offerings.

Server hosting plan details showing Strong package with 2 cores CPU, 4 GB RAM, 50 GB SSD, Windows or Linux OS, 1 IP address, VMware virtualization, 100 Mbps channel, and 1 Gbps TAS-IX

Airnet provides 100Mb/s to internet and 1Gbit/s to TAS-IX in their cheapest plan.

For the Uzbek market, this offering seemed reasonable, even though it doesn’t compare to the 10Gb/s speeds I’m used to in Europe.

Servercore advertised 100Mb/s for everything including TAS-IX, which initially concerned me.

Server cost configuration panel showing monthly pricing details for CPU, RAM, SSD storage, IOPS, and public IP with total cost in Uzbekistani som (UZS)

However, my testing revealed surprising results that I’ll share in the benchmark section.

I also tested other providers like Ahost.uz (up to 10Mbit/s internet, 100Mb/s TAS-IX) and Eskiz.uz (good prices but slow internet speeds).

However, their performance didn’t meet my requirements for high-speed connectivity.

VPS Specifications and Pricing Comparison

VPS UZBEKISTAN SPECS
SERVERCORE VS AIRNET COMPARISON
Specification
Servercore
Airnet
Advantage
Pricing & Plans
Monthly Price
$22
$15
Airnet
Billing Model
Pay-as-you-go
Monthly Prepaid
Flexible
Deployment Time
Instant
1-2 Hours
Servercore
Hardware Specifications
CPU
AMD EPYC 7713
Intel Xeon E5-2690
Modern
RAM
2GB
2GB
Same
Storage
50GB (EBS)
50GB
Same
Virtualization
OpenStack
VMware
Open Source
Network & Features
CPU
AMD EPYC 7713
Intel Xeon E5-2690
Modern
Network Speed
100Mb/s
100Mb/s + 1Gb TAS-IX
Airnet
Traffic Limit
3TB
Unlimited
Airnet
Control Panel
Cloud Console
Web Interface
Advanced
Operating Systems
Multiply Linux
Multiply Linux
More Options
Location
Tashkent, UZ
Tashkent, UZ
Same

Key Specification Highlights

Best Price
$15
Airnet: $15/month
Servercore: $22/month
Instant Deploy
Instant
Servercore: Instant
Airnet: 1-2 Hours
Modern CPU
Servercore: AMD EPYC 7713
Airnet: Intel Xeon E5-2690
VPS Uzbekistan specifications and pricing comparison | Visualization created by hostbor Basic specifications comparison of Servercore vs Airnet VPS hosting providers in Uzbekistan market.

To ensure a fair comparison, I ordered similar specifications from both cheap VPS Uzbekistan providers.

Airnet.uz VPS Configuration

  • 2 CPU cores
  • 4GB RAM
  • 50GB SSD storage
  • 1x IPv4 address
  • 100Mb/s internet connection
  • 1Gbit/s VPS TAS-IX connection
  • Price: 200,000 UZS (~15 USD) per month (10% discount for 12-month payment)

Servercore.uz VPS Configuration

  • 2 CPU cores
  • 4GB RAM
  • 50GB SSD (cheapest EBS network storage option)
  • 1x IPv4 address
  • 100Mb/s internet and TAS-IX connection
  • Price: 293,000 UZS (~22 USD) per month or ~10,000 UZS (~0.8 USD) per day
💡
Servercore offers more flexibility with a 1CPU/1GB RAM/5GB SSD option for 110,000 UZS (~9 USD) monthly and pay-as-you-go billing at just 150 UZS (~0.01 USD) per hour for quick testing.

VPS Creation Speed and User Experience

My experience with VPS activation differed significantly between these secure VPS Tashkent providers.

With Servercore, I was impressed by the instant deployment.

Screen displaying a source select menu for server and Linux operating system images with memory and volume details
Servercore

My virtual server Uzbekistan was ready within minutes of payment, similar to what I’ve experienced with major cloud providers like AWS.

Airnet required more patience in my experience.

Their website indicates 1-2 hours during business hours, but when I placed my order on a Friday evening requesting a specific OS not in their standard image library, I had to wait until Tuesday.

This was a learning experience that taught me to order during business hours with standard configurations.

✔️
For quick testing scenarios, Servercore wins hands down with their pay-as-you-go model allowing immediate deployment for just 150 UZS per hour.

Comprehensive VPS Benchmark Results

I conducted extensive benchmarks using multiple tools to compare VPS Uzbekistan performance accurately.

Both providers use different virtualization technologies.

Servercore operates on OpenStack cloud infrastructure while Airnet uses VMware virtualization.

CPU Performance: Geekbench 6 Results

GEEKBENCH 6
Single Core & Multicore Benchmark
Servercore AMD EPYC 7713
2167
1215
Airnet Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
1749
994
Multicore Score
Single Core Score
Data source: CPU Performance: Geekbench 6 Results | Visualization created by hostbor Linux VPS Tashkent CPU benchmark comparison.

My CPU benchmark revealed interesting differences in my Linux VPS Tashkent testing:

Servercore (AMD EPYC 7713):

  • Single-core: 1,215 points
  • Multi-core: 2,167 points

Airnet (Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4):

  • Single-core: 994 points
  • Multi-core: 1,749 points

Servercore’s AMD EPYC processor delivered approximately 22% better single-core and 24% better multi-core performance in my testing.

Internet Speed Test Results

INTERNET SPEED COMPARISON
SERVERCORE VS AIRNET PERFORMANCE
TAS-IX Network
International
Local TAS-IX Performance
Uzbekistan Internet Exchange Network
SC
Servercore
KVM • OpenStack
↓ Download 902 Mb/s
↑ Upload 878 Mb/s
Latency 1ms
AN
Airnet
VMware • Traditional
↓ Download 971 Mb/s
↑ Upload 2,076 Mb/s
Latency 1ms
🏆 TAS-IX Champion: Airnet
Superior upload speeds (2.4x faster) with excellent download performance
TAS-IX Global VPS
Speed test data from actual VPS deployments | Visualization created by hostbor
Note: Servercore’s international speeds significantly exceed advertised rates and may vary

The speed tests revealed the most surprising results of this entire comparison.

TAS-IX Speed Test (Sarkor Telecom):

Servercore delivered 902 Mb/s download and 878 Mb/s upload with 1ms latency.

Airnet achieved 971 Mb/s download and an impressive 2,076 Mb/s upload with 1ms latency.

Internet speed test results showing download speed of 971.13 Mbps and upload speed of 2076.02 Mbps from AirNet in Tashkent

While this test gave Airnet the edge on uploads, other system benchmarks revealed a different outcome for downloads, where Servercore was able to reach speeds exceeding 8 Gbit/s on other TAS-IX connections.

International Speed Test (Prague, Alliance a.s.):

Here’s where I discovered the game-changing difference.

Servercore delivered 4,953 Mb/s download and 849 Mb/s upload with 99ms latency.

Airnet provided 187 Mb/s download and 117 Mb/s upload with 100ms latency.

Servercore’s actual international speed performance was 26x faster than their advertised limits, making them the clear winner for applications requiring high uptime VPS Uzbekistan with international connectivity.

High-speed internet speed test results showing download speed of 4953.38 Mbps and upload speed of 849.13 Mbps with ping values displayed.

Worth noting that Servercore has a 3TB monthly traffic limit, while Airnet doesn’t specify traffic restrictions in their documentation.

💪
Important: These speed test results, particularly Servercore’s exceptional international performance, significantly exceed their advertised rates and may change over time due to infrastructure updates or network conditions.

I recommend conducting your own speed tests after deployment to verify current performance levels for your specific use case.

SSD VPS Hosting Uzbekistan Storage Performance

SSD STORAGE PERFORMANCE
VPS UZBEKISTAN COMPARISON
Sequential I/O
Random I/O
Overview
Servercore
EBS Network SSD
Sequential Read 200 MiB/s
Sequential Write 200 MiB/s
Airnet
Standard SSD
Sequential Read 1,016 MiB/s
Sequential Write 192 MiB/s
🏆 Sequential Read Winner: Airnet
5.1x faster read performance (1,016 vs 200 MiB/s)
💡 Performance Upgrade Available
Servercore offers local NVMe SSD options with up to 12,800 read IOPS and 6,400 write IOPS for performance-critical applications.
SSD Performance Comparison | Visualization created by hostbor
Data source: Custom benchmark testing on VPS Uzbekistan providers

I tested storage performance using both custom benchmarks and standardized tools.

Since I chose the cheapest SSD option from Servercore (EBS network storage), the results reflect budget-tier performance:

Servercore SSD Performance:

  • Sequential Read/Write Throughput: 200 MiB/s
  • Random Read IOPS: 2,032
  • Random Write IOPS: 2,028

Airnet SSD Performance:

  • Sequential Read Throughput: 1,016 MiB/s
  • Sequential Write Throughput: 192 MiB/s
  • Random Read IOPS: 2,029
  • Random Write IOPS: 1,386

Airnet excelled in sequential read performance (5x faster), while Servercore showed better random write performance.

It’s also important to mention that my test used their network SSD; for performance-critical applications, Servercore offers a local NVMe SSD option with much higher IOPS, rated up to 12,800 for reads and 6,400 for writes.

Load Testing Performance Analysis

I conducted comprehensive load tests on both managed VPS Uzbekistan servers to measure their capacity under real-world conditions.

Servercore Load Testing Results:

Basic Application Test (Python HTTP Server):

SERVERCORE BASIC TEST
Python HTTP Server Performance
100
Users
STABLE
Requests/sec 718.33
Latency
92.41ms
Errors
10
400
Users
STABLE
Requests/sec 716.76
Latency
102.30ms
Errors
17
800
Users
STABLE
Requests/sec 711.79
Latency
43.30ms
Errors
14
1200
Users
ERRORS
Requests/sec 719.73
Latency
87.79ms
Errors
181
Performance Summary

Python HTTP server maintains consistent throughput (~715 req/s) up to 1200 users but shows connection errors at peak load. Best performance at 800 users with lowest latency.

Data source: Load testing with Apache Bench | Visualization created by hostbor

Optimized Test (Nginx Server):

SERVERCORE NGINX OPTIMIZED
High-Performance Web Server
Performance
Error Analysis
400
Concurrent Users
29,416
Requests/sec
21.27ms
Latency
0
Errors
800
Concurrent Users
29,507
Requests/sec
3.36ms
Latency
0
Errors
1600
Concurrent Users
29,595
Requests/sec
15.04ms
Latency
581
Errors
Nginx Optimization Results

Nginx delivers exceptional performance with ~29,500 req/s consistently across all loads. Optimal performance at 800 users with 3.36ms latency. Connection errors begin at 1600+ users.

Data source: Load testing with Apache Bench | Visualization created by hostbor

Airnet Load Testing Results:

Basic Application Test (Python HTTP Server):

AIRNET BASIC TEST
Python HTTP Server Performance
200 Users
800 Users
High Load
200
Users
OPTIMAL
764.56
Requests/sec
Latency
66.15ms
Errors
3
800
Users
STABLE
712.28
Requests/sec
Latency
83.30ms
Errors
15
1200
Users
DEGRADED
656.60
Requests/sec
Latency
103.54ms
Errors
181
1600
Users
CRITICAL
686.78
Requests/sec
Latency
98.73ms
Errors
581
Airnet Performance Analysis

Peak performance at 200 users (764.56 req/s). Performance degrades significantly after 800 users with increasing connection errors. Optimal operating range: 200-800 concurrent users.

Data source: Load testing with Apache Bench | Visualization created by hostbor

Optimized Test (Nginx Server):

AIRNET NGINX OPTIMIZED
High-Performance Configuration
400
Concurrent Users
PERFECT
17,589
Requests per Second
95%
6.14ms
Latency
0
Errors
800
Concurrent Users
OPTIMAL
18,263
Requests per Second
100%
10.53ms
Latency
0
Errors
High Load Scenarios
1600
Users
18,107 req/s
581 errors
3200
Users
17,257 req/s
2,181 errors
6400
Users
17,259 req/s
5,381 errors
Performance vs Servercore
~62% of Servercore’s peak

Nginx optimization achieves excellent performance (~18K req/s peak) with zero errors up to 800 users. Maintains solid throughput even at extreme loads with graceful degradation.

Data source: Load testing with Apache Bench | Visualization created by hostbor
💡
These tests demonstrate that both providers offer solid KVM VPS Uzbekistan performance, with Servercore showing 62% higher maximum throughput in optimized scenarios.

Overall System Benchmarks (bench.sh & yabs.sh)

Servercore System Overview:

My Servercore VPS runs on an AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core Processor with KVM virtualization technology.

The system demonstrates consistent I/O performance with an average speed of 199.3 MB/s across multiple test runs, showing excellent stability in storage operations.

Benchmark results from a shell script showing performance metrics including CPU details, memory, disk usage, and network speed tests from multiple global locations.
Servercore | Snapshot of a server benchmark script output displaying CPU specs, memory usage, disk space, and upload/download speeds across various nodes worldwide.

Airnet System Overview:

My Airnet VPS operates on an Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz processor using VMware virtualization.

The system achieved an average I/O speed of 119.0 MB/s, which is approximately 40% slower than Servercore’s performance in disk operations.

For a detailed side-by-side comparison of the full bench.sh and yabs.sh results, check out my complete benchmark visualization below.

VPS PERFORMANCE SHOWDOWN
Servercore vs Airnet • bench.sh & yabs.sh benchmark tests
System Overview
CPU Performance
Storage I/O
Network Speed
Servercore
KVM Virtualization
WINNER
CPU Architecture
AMD EPYC 7713
Base Clock
2.0 GHz
Memory
3.8 GB RAM
Storage
49.2 GB
Performance Highlights
Geekbench Multi-Core 2,182
I/O Average 199.3 MB/s
Local Network 8.1 Gbps
Airnet
VMware Virtualization
CPU Architecture
Intel Xeon E5-2690
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
Memory
3.8 GB RAM
Storage
48.9 GB
Performance Highlights
Geekbench Multi-Core 1,789
I/O Average 119.0 MB/s
Local Network 226 Mbps
VPS Performance Analysis | Data source: bench.sh & yabs.sh benchmark tests | Visualization created by hostbor
Tested on similar VPS configurations in Tashkent, Uzbekistan data centers

Customer Support Experience

In my experience, both reliable cloud hosting Uzbekistan providers offered responsive support during business hours.

I had one frustrating experience with Servercore regarding VPN usage.

Initially, their support suggested that filling out documentation for public IP whitelisting would enable VPN usage.

However, after weeks of waiting, I learned this was only available for registered companies, not individual users.

When I asked Airnet the same question, they immediately clarified that VPN services were only available to Uzbekistan-registered companies.

Both providers typically resolve 80% of support requests within one hour during business hours.

Additional Services and Platform Features

The platform capabilities differ significantly between these cloud server Tashkent providers.

Servercore impressed me with their comprehensive cloud platform that rivals AWS or Hetzner in functionality.

  • Advanced firewall management
  • Object storage solutions
  • Additional public IP allocation
  • Volume freeze/unfreeze capabilities
  • Custom image uploads
  • Automated backup systems
  • Internal high-speed networking
  • Load balancers
  • Managed Kubernetes
  • Database services
  • API and Terraform integration
User interface of a web hosting control panel in Russian showing a dropdown menu with server management options including VNC console, reboot, reset, power off, order extra services, change tariff, renew order, print contract, and invoice details.
Airnet | Dropdown menu with server control and billing options on a hosting management interface

Airnet offers more basic VPS management with limited additional services:

  • VNC console access
  • Basic power management (shutdown, restart, reset)
  • OS reinstallation through support tickets
✔️
For users needing advanced cloud infrastructure features, Servercore provides enterprise-grade capabilities that justify the higher pricing.

Payment Methods and Billing Flexibility

Both providers support VPS Uzbekistan UZCARD/Humo payment along with other local payment methods.

Servercore’s pay-as-you-go model provides unprecedented flexibility.

I can pay hourly, daily, or monthly based on usage.

Airnet requires monthly prepayment, and I experienced complications during cancellation where I received payment reminders even after confirming cancellation.

Pros and Cons Analysis

Servercore.uz Advantages

  • Superior international internet speeds (26x faster than advertised)
  • Better CPU performance (22-24% higher scores)
  • Instant VPS deployment
  • Flexible pay-as-you-go billing
  • Comprehensive cloud platform features
  • Lower entry-level pricing options

Servercore.uz Limitations

  • Higher pricing for equivalent specifications
  • 3TB monthly traffic limitation

Airnet.uz Advantages

  • Better pricing for standard VPS configurations
  • Superior TAS-IX upload speeds (2+ Gb/s)
  • Excellent sequential read storage performance
  • No mentioned traffic limitations

Airnet.uz Limitations

  • Slower international internet speeds
  • Longer VPS deployment times
  • Limited platform features
  • Monthly prepayment requirement
  • Higher minimum pricing entry point

Who Should Choose Which Provider

PROVIDER MATCH
WHO SHOULD CHOOSE WHICH VPS

Finding Your VPS Provider Match

Choosing between Servercore and Airnet depends on your specific requirements, traffic patterns, and budget considerations. This analysis helps identify which Uzbekistan VPS provider aligns best with your use case based on comprehensive performance testing and real-world usage scenarios.

Servercore Perfect Match

International Traffic High Performance

Businesses requiring exceptional international connectivity, instant deployment capabilities, and enterprise-grade cloud platform features. Ideal for applications with global user bases or heavy international data transfer needs.

4,950 Mbps international speeds (26x advertised)
AMD EPYC 7713 superior CPU performance
Instant deployment & pay-as-you-go flexibility
Best for Global Applications

Airnet Optimal Choice

Local Focus Budget-Friendly

Projects focusing primarily on TAS-IX connectivity, cost-effective hosting solutions, or applications where superior storage read performance matters more than international bandwidth speeds.

2+ Gbps TAS-IX upload performance
Better pricing for standard configurations
5x faster sequential storage reads
Perfect for Regional Projects

Enterprise Requirements

Professional Scalability

Organizations needing comprehensive cloud infrastructure with advanced features like load balancers, object storage, and database services. Priority on instant provisioning and enterprise-grade reliability.

Servercore Advantages:
  • Complete cloud ecosystem with multiple services
  • Superior CPU performance (AMD EPYC vs Intel Xeon)
  • 62% higher load test throughput capacity
  • OpenStack infrastructure for better scalability
Choose Servercore for Business Critical

Cost-Conscious Scenarios

Value-Focused Regional Use

Small businesses, startups, or personal projects where budget optimization matters most. Applications primarily serving Uzbekistan/Central Asian markets with minimal global traffic requirements.

Airnet Benefits:
  • More affordable standard VPS configurations
  • No traffic limitations (vs 3TB cap)
  • Excellent storage performance for data-heavy apps
  • Strong local network connectivity
Choose Airnet for Budget Optimization
Decision Framework:
Choose Servercore if international performance, enterprise features, or instant deployment are priorities. The 26x faster international speeds justify the premium for global applications. Choose Airnet for budget-conscious projects focusing on local/regional markets where TAS-IX performance matters more than international connectivity. Both providers offer excellent local latency and solid foundations for Uzbekistan-based hosting needs.
VPS Uzbekistan provider selection guide based on performance testing | Visualization created by hostbor

Choose Servercore if you need:

  • High-speed international connectivity
  • Advanced cloud platform features
  • Instant deployment for testing
  • Pay-as-you-go billing flexibility
  • Windows VPS Uzbekistan solutions
  • Maximum CPU performance

Choose Airnet if you prioritize:

  • Cost-effective standard VPS configurations
  • Primary TAS-IX usage with minimal international traffic
  • Storage-intensive applications requiring high sequential read speeds
  • Simple VPS management without advanced features
  • Unlimited traffic usage

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best VPS provider in Uzbekistan?

Based on my extensive testing, Servercore.uz offers the best overall performance, especially for applications requiring high international internet speeds and advanced cloud features, while Airnet.uz provides better value for budget-conscious users primarily using TAS-IX connectivity.

Can I migrate VPS to Uzbekistan from international providers?

Yes, both providers support migration services.

Servercore offers more automated migration tools through their platform, while Airnet provides migration assistance through their support team during the setup process.

Which VPS offers better TAS-IX performance in Tashkent?

The TAS-IX performance was complex: in my Ookla test to a specific provider, Airnet showed superior upload speeds exceeding 2 Gb/s.

However, in other automated benchmarks, Servercore demonstrated phenomenal download speeds of over 8 Gbit/s, suggesting that performance varies depending on the specific test and connection within the TAS-IX network.

Do Uzbekistan VPS providers support Windows operating systems?

Both providers offer Windows VPS Uzbekistan solutions. Servercore provides more flexibility with custom image uploads, while Airnet supports standard Windows installations through their support team.

What are the cheapest VPS options in Uzbekistan?

Servercore offers the lowest entry point at 110,000 UZS (~8 USD) monthly for 1CPU/1GB RAM/5GB SSD, with hourly billing at 150 UZS per hour.

Airnet’s minimum plan costs 200,000 UZS (~15 USD) monthly for 2CPU/4GB RAM/50GB SSD.

How fast can I deploy a VPS in Uzbekistan?

Servercore provides instant deployment within minutes, while Airnet requires 1-2 hours during business hours and potentially longer for custom configurations or weekend orders.

Which provider offers better SSD VPS hosting performance?

For sequential read operations, Airnet delivers 5x faster performance (1,016 MiB/s vs 200 MiB/s).

For random operations, both providers offer similar performance around 2,000 IOPS, though Servercore’s network storage allows for easy volume management and backups.

Can I use VPN services with Uzbekistan VPS providers?

Both providers restrict VPN usage to registered companies only.

Individual users cannot use these VPS servers for VPN services due to local regulations, regardless of technical capabilities.

Final Verdict: My Recommendation

VPS UZBEKISTAN VERDICT
SERVERCORE VS AIRNET COMPARISON
🥇 SERVERCORE WINS
Primary choice for most use cases
WINNER
Servercore
Premium Performance
26x faster international speed
Instant deployment
Enterprise features
Airnet
Budget-Friendly Choice
Better pricing
No traffic limits
Fast TAS-IX speeds
Choose Servercore for:
International projects • Enterprise apps • High-performance needs • Cloud-native workloads
Choose Airnet for:
Budget projects • Local traffic • TAS-IX focused • Development/testing
Data source: Personal VPS testing in Uzbekistan | Visualization created by hostbor Comprehensive comparison based on real-world benchmarks and testing

After conducting this comprehensive compare VPS Uzbekistan analysis, I’ve chosen Servercore as my primary provider for most use cases.

The deciding factors were the exceptional international internet performance (26x faster than advertised), superior CPU benchmarks, instant deployment, and comprehensive cloud platform features that rival major international providers.

However, I continue to recommend Airnet for specific scenarios where budget constraints are primary concerns or when applications primarily utilize TAS-IX connectivity with minimal international traffic requirements.

Both providers represent the top tier of VPS Uzbekistan options available in the market.

Your choice should depend on your specific performance requirements, budget constraints, and feature needs.

✔️
For most users requiring fast VPS Uzbekistan with international connectivity, Servercore provides the best overall value despite higher pricing. For budget-conscious users with primarily local traffic needs, Airnet offers excellent value proposition.

Categorized in:

HomeLab & Self-Hosting,